Status of NNW's in HEP Experiments
-
CDF Neural Network Triggers
-
The CDF experiment at the Tevatron
proton-antiproton collider at Fermilab
in the USA has had several calorimeter neural network triggers running
for several of years now. See Badget
1992 for some early results. Three ETANN
fastbus cards , receive analog signals from 50 trigger towers. Two
of the ETANN's do not use trained networks. One of these identifies isolated
photon showers in the central calorimeter and the other looks for isolated
electron showers in the plug calorimeter. Differences in the weighted
sums of central and surrounding towers are calculated by the chips and
then thresholds cuts on the outputs provide the triggers. The third network
implements a trained network to identify b-jets in the central calorimeter.
A tau finding network with a trainied network has been developed recently
and implemented in the 1994-1995 run by a group from Rutgers.
The network has performed satisfactorily at triggering on tau 1-prong hadronic
decay events but not well on 3-prong. Although the chip emulation worked
well with both types of events, the chip-in-the-loop training of the ETANN
diverged badly (all weights went to max values) from the initially loaded
emulation network. So they have used only the initial downloaded network,
which, because of the inexact nature of the analog chip, does not perform
as well as a network tuned with chip-in-the-loop training. There are now
plans to examine the possibilities of a digital hardware network for future
runs.
-
CP-LEAR Neural Networks
-
Neural networks for tracking and triggering have been developed for possible
use in the CP-LEAR experiment.
The hardware networks can
-
count and locate tracks in the tracking detector within 75ns using NNW's
implemented in 16 cards with commercial ECL chips (Athanasiu,
Leimgruber);
-
do on-line event selection, using information from the tracking network,
within 40microsecs with a NNW implemented on a commercial DSP board (Pavalopoulos).
In both cases, the NNW's were found to perform better than the traditional
methods. For further details see the above references, a brief hardware
description , and the CP-LEAR/Basel NNW
Activities Report.
-
H1 1st Level Neural Network Trigger
-
The H1 experiment at the HERA ep
Collider at the DESY Laboratory in Hamburg,
Ge., has developed a 1st level trigger that runs in 50ns in addition to
the 2nd level trigger discussed below. It is based on the Neuroclassifier
chip that was specifically designed for this experiment. This chip has
70 analog inputs, 6 hidden neurons with 5-bit digitally loaded weights
and sigmoidal transfer functions, and 1 summed output (transfer function
is off-chip to give the option of combining chips to increase the number
of hidden units). A fast real-time tracking system provides a 16 bin histogram
of track vertices along the beamline. A true electron-proton interaction
will create a sharp peak in this histogram at the location of the collision.
Whereas, a background event of a proton-beamgas or proton-beampipe collision
will usually result in a flat distribution of vertices. These 16 bins are
fed into the chip, which then gives yes/no answer to whether there is a
good peak in the proper range. This trigger will go online in the fall
of 1995. For futher info, see Tong et al
and Schiek and Schmidt .
-
H1 2nd Level Neural Network Trigger
-
The H1 experiment at the HERA ep
Collider at the DESY Laboratory in Hamburg,
Ge., has implemented a level 2 trigger based on hardware neural networks.
Here is the abstract from The Realization of a Second Level Neural Network
Trigger for the H1 Experiment at HERA, Fent et al presented by J.H.Koehne
at AIHENP'96, Lausanne, Switzerland, Sept.2-8, 1996:
The 1996 period of H1 data taking at the electron proton
collider HERA at DESY (Hamburg) will be the first year with a fully equipped
second level trigger (L2). Two independent systems of pattern recognition
machines are operating as event rejectors within 20 microseconds deadtime
after the keep signal of the pipelined (2.1 microseconds) deadtime-free
first level (L1) trigger producing an input rate to L2 of up to 1 kHz.
One of the two systems is the neural network trigger. It is based
upon an array of VME-boards with a CNAPS 1064 chip (20 MHz) by Adaptive
Solutions. The single instruction multiple data (SIMD) architecture of
the 64-processor-nodes-chip allows to compute a 64-64-1-feed-forward neural
network. With 8-bit input values and 16-bit weights stored in 4kb look
up tables on each individual node the output value is computed in 8 microseconds.
Both systems use a 8x16 bit wide L2 20-MHz-bus to transmit the L1 information
from the subdetectors to the L2-machines. The total transmission time is
3.1 microseconds. The data for the neural network are prepared for the
CNAPS input by a 'Data Distribution Board' providing several algorithms
realized by transfer functions (look up tables) and simple arithmetic funtions
implemented in a field programmable gate array XILINX 4008. An internet
server with two child processes for loading and monitoring of the system
runs on a Themis VME-Sun with two HyperSpark processors. The client application
allows full control and loading of the machine from a X11-graphical user
interface.
They have used 10 of the Adaptive Solutions CNAPS
VME digital neural network cards. See the L2
Neuro Group home page and their hypertext
paper for more details.
-
NEMO Experiment: Tracking with Elastic Networks and Cellular Automata
-
From the NEMO
Software Group home page:
The goal of NEMO collaboration is to study double-beta decay
without the emission of neutrinos of 100Mo and other nuclei to probe the
effective Majorananeutrino mass down to 0.1 eV. The peculiarity of the
NEMO experiment is presence of very low energy electrons, so we must take
into account quite large multiple scattering effects in the heliumgas as
well as hard interactions with different wires. We use a cellular automaton
for searching for and an elastic net for fitting of charged particles trajectories
with multiple scattering and breaks on wires. The advantages of the methods
are simplicity of the algorithms, fast and stable convergency to real tracks,
and reconstruction efficiency close to 100%. Both these methods were used
for event reconstruction in the NEMO-2 experiment. Results of the application
are successful. The next stage of our investigation will be taking into
account a magnetic field to develop the algorithms for the NEMO-3 experiment.
-
WA-92 Neural Network Demonstration Experiment
-
Here is the abstract from Baldanza
et al. 1994 preprint:
Results from a non-leptonic neural-network trigger hosted
by experiment WA92, looking for beauty particle production from 350 GeV
negative pions on a fixed Cu target are presented. The neural trigger has
been used to send events selected by means of a non-leptonic signature
based on microvertext detector information to a special stream, meant for
early analysis. The non-leptonic signature, defined in a neural-network
fashion, was devised so as to enrich the selected sample in the number
of events containing C3 secondary vertices (i.e. vertices having three
tracks with sum of electric charges equal to +1 or -1), which are sought
for further analysis to identify charm and beauty non-leptonic decays.
The neural trigger module consists of a VME crate hosting two MA16
digital neural chips from Siemens and two ETANN
analog neural chips from Intel. During the experimental run, only the ETANN
chips were operational. The neural trigger operated for two continuous
weeks during the WA92 1993 run. For an acceptance of 15% for C3 events,
the neural trigger yields a C3 enrichment factor of 6.6-7.1 (depending
on the event sample considered), which multiplied by that already provided
by the standard trigger leads to a global C3 enrichment factor of ~150.
In the event sample selected by the neural trigger, one every ~7 events
contains a C3 vertex. The response time of the neural trigger module is
5.8microsecs.
NNW/HEP
Home Page
Authors: Clark
S. Lindsey , Bruce Denby
, & Thomas
Lindblad
Curator: Clark S. Lindsey (lindsey@particle.kth.se)
Latest revision: 23 Oct 1996